Texas Car Accident Claims When Insurance Limits Fall Short

A serious Houston car accident might leave someone facing $150,000 in medical expenses while the responsible driver carries only $30,000 in liability insurance. The insurance company acknowledges its policy limits, but that does not necessarily establish the injured person’s total legal recovery. Under Texas law, insurance coverage limits and the actual value of a personal injury claim are separate financial and legal questions.

Understanding this distinction is essential when evaluating settlement offers, identifying additional coverage, and determining whether an insurance company has fulfilled its legal obligations.

Texas Requires Minimum Automobile Liability Coverage

Texas Transportation Code Section 601.072 establishes minimum financial responsibility requirements for motorists. Drivers purchasing liability insurance generally must maintain:

  • $30,000 for bodily injury or death involving one person.
  • $60,000 for bodily injuries or deaths involving multiple people in one accident.
  • $25,000 for property damage arising from one collision.

These requirements are commonly called 30/60/25 coverage.

The statutory minimum represents an insurance requirement, not a maximum limit on personal injury damages. A driver responsible for a serious collision might face legal liability exceeding the available insurance coverage.

Policy Limits Do Not Establish the Claim’s Value

A personal injury claim involves determining the damages caused by another person’s negligence. Medical expenses, lost earnings, rehabilitation costs, and future treatment needs contribute to the calculation. Recoverable non-economic damages also depend on the injuries and their consequences.

The Houston car accident attorneys at Thiessen Law Firm represent individuals pursuing compensation following vehicle collisions. Investigating available insurance coverage is important, but the claim’s value must be established independently of the insurer’s maximum payment obligation.

For example, an insurer offering its $30,000 policy limit does not necessarily establish that the victim’s damages total only $30,000.

Underinsured Motorist Coverage Provides Additional Protection

Texas Insurance Code Section 1952.101 requires automobile insurers to provide uninsured and underinsured motorist coverage unless the named insured rejects it in writing.

Underinsured motorist coverage addresses qualifying losses when the responsible driver’s liability insurance is insufficient. However, the injured person’s own policy determines the available coverage and applicable contractual requirements.

The Law Brigade’s discussion of insurance limitations in Texas explains why identifying collectible sources of compensation matters. A substantial injury judgment does not guarantee payment when the defendant lacks sufficient insurance or recoverable assets.

Personal Injury Protection Has Different Requirements

Under Section 1952.152, Texas insurers must provide personal injury protection coverage unless the named insured rejects it in writing.

Section 1952.153 establishes a $2,500 minimum offering requirement. PIP benefits address qualifying medical expenses, lost income, and certain other expenses regardless of fault.

PIP coverage and liability insurance serve different purposes. Receiving PIP payments does not independently determine the compensation recoverable through a negligence claim.

The Stowers Doctrine Addresses Unreasonable Settlement Refusals

Texas recognizes an insurer’s duty to protect its insured from certain unreasonable settlement decisions.

In In re Farmers Texas County Mutual Insurance Co., 621 S.W.3d 261 (Tex. 2021), the Texas Supreme Court reaffirmed the requirements governing claims under the Stowers doctrine.

The duty arises when the claim falls within coverage, the settlement demand is within policy limits, and an ordinarily prudent insurer would accept the demand considering the potential exposure to an excess judgment.

A Stowers claim generally requires the insured to face liability exceeding policy limits because of the insurer’s negligent failure to settle. The duty belongs to the insured, not automatically to the injured third-party claimant.

Multiple Injured People Complicate Insurance Payments

The $60,000 bodily injury limit in a minimum Texas policy applies collectively when multiple people suffer injuries in one collision. Each individual remains subject to the $30,000 per-person limit.

For example, three injured occupants with substantial medical expenses might compete for the same $60,000 coverage limit. The existence of several valid injury claims does not increase the policy’s aggregate limit.

Settlement negotiations must therefore account for other injured claimants and additional sources of insurance.

Comparative Fault Reduces Recoverable Damages

Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code Section 33.001 generally prevents recovery when the claimant’s responsibility exceeds 50%.

Under Section 33.012, lesser percentages reduce recoverable damages proportionately. A claimant assigned 20% responsibility for $100,000 in damages would generally recover $80,000 before other adjustments.

The Law Brigade’s guide to Texas car accident claims discusses evidence needed to establish responsibility and financial losses.

A high insurance limit does not eliminate the need to prove negligence, causation, and damages.

Filing Deadlines Remain Separate From Insurance Negotiations

Section 16.003 generally establishes a two-year limitation period for Texas personal injury lawsuits, subject to statutory exceptions.

Negotiating with an insurance company does not automatically extend this deadline. Delays also create difficulties obtaining medical records, surveillance footage, and witness information.

The central issue is not simply whether the responsible driver’s insurance covers the entire loss. A complete investigation must establish the legally recoverable damages, identify every available source of compensation, and determine whether additional legal remedies exist when insurance limits fall short.

This article provides general legal information and is not individualized legal advice.